Thursday, May 15, 2008

Foil in the Oven: Back in Control

Holy Shit, It's the Boston Celtics!

Those are the exact words that I said to myself about halfway through the third quarter.



The first half was ugly for most of the way. It seemed like nothing was working right offensively. Sam Cassell's five and a half minutes were a complete disaster (for the record, I've never seen so many Eddie House t-shirts). And, to make matters worse, LeBron was scoring points with ease (23 in the first quarter). At one point, Cleveland led by 14 and it seemed like the Celtics were just going to dig themselves into a deeper hole. You could feel the tension building in the arena. I couldn't cheer, I couldn't stand up, all I could do was sit there as the anger and frustration grew with every possession. To be honest, that whole first quarter and most of the second quarter seem like a blur now.

During the last five minutes of the second quarter, the Cs started to claw their way back in. Rondo came back into the game and hit a couple of big threes, we got some stops, and Pierce hit a runner with less than 5 seconds left that put us within three. Only down three, after that pathetic display. I got up for halftime and headed over to get some beer and a personal pizza. I was feeling less tense. I was relieved to only be down three, and excited that Jay-Z was in the building.


As I waited in line, I started thinking about the Hornets on Tuesday night. They too had played a bad first half. They too had found themselves only trailing by three at halftime. They came out, made adjustments, played a great second half, and won the game. Of course, that was a team that has been playing just as well (and, probably better) than they played in the regular season. That's a team that has shown the ability to hang tough and come from behind in games in the post-season. That's a team with a great coach who knows how to manage players and make adjustments. I was tense again. Why couldn't this team just play like the Celtics we've seen all year? Who is this team that I just watched in the first half?


And then, just when things seemed on the verge of collapsing completely, the real Boston Celtics appeared.


I can't point to any specific moment when it happened, because they played great the entire half. The defense was stifling, the ball movement and execution on offense was smooth. The players carried themselves like a team that knows it's in control and is confident that it's going to win. The noise in the building rose to a near-deafening level as Celtics fans everywhere felt the tension of the last ten quarters rush away.


A few notes

- The Celtics almost blew the game in the last minute. I don't know if it was a result of them being too comfortable with the lead or if they need to spend some time practicing end of game situations when the opponent presses them hard. This game was not as close as the final score would indicate. But, the Celtics kept it interesting with turnovers at the end.

- Huge game tonight from Rondo. Not only was he spectacular on both ends of the floor, but he played the entire second half. We've been saying all along that he's the key. This game is going to be great for his confidence. I can't stress enough the importance of those threes that he hit in the first half. It was also good to see Doc leave him out there when he played well.

- Nice to see some second half adjustments from Doc tonight. While I was totally baffled by the way he used Glen Davis on Monday, I loved what he did tonight. Putting Big Baby on the floor with Rondo and the Big Three was a great move. He gave the team a huge energy boost, and he was able to grab a couple nice hoops while the Cavs were so focused on stopping KG down low. I also loved having Pierce (30 points) start with the ball up top. It was a great way to get him some separation and to give the Cavs another look.


- Those who have been calling for KG to step up, be aggressive, and take over games got it last night. KG was extremely active on defense, it seemed like he was hitting all of his shots, and you could see him getting in his teammates' faces to keep them hungry. It was the classic KG that we all love and have always seen at home. If he can take that same game with him to Cleveland on Friday, this series may not return to Boston.

Great quote from ESPN about Doc Rivers and why he didn't call KG over to calm him down during the game "Rivers said 'he was talking so much to himself anyways, I didn't think I'd be able to get a word in'".

I love this interview with KG and John Thompson. I watched it about 55 times the day that the Cs acquired Garnett from Minnesota:




Now, after watching that, can you ever imagine KG saying the things LeBron said last night after a loss? "Great individual performance by me" (an indirect insult to his teammates). I couldn't be happier to be on KG's side. The Celtics are going to win this series.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Arlen Spector is an idiot (typical Eagles fan), and that's coming from someone that's not a Patriots fan. He clearly knows nothing about football, and I can't believe that that he is calling for Congressional involvement in this matter.

Now, I was outspoken against the Mitchell Investigation. I thought that baseball's best option was to move forward with their harsh new policy, and not waste Congressional time, money, and energy investigating the past. But, at least when we talk about sterroids, we're dealing with actual breaking of the law. We're dealing with drug use, and international drug trafficking. We're dealing with high school kids all over the country with a dream of becoming a pro athlete, and a choice to make about sterroid use. What are we dealing with here? A breach of NFL rules? No law was broken here. I think Roger Goodell, by handing down a harsh penalty on the Patriots, did a great job of deterring this practice and I think that he will work hard to enforce it because he doesn't want his league to lose credibility. The incentive for him to police it is so huge, that I don't know why we doubt his motivation.

Right after the original Spygate happened in September, I thought that Belichick should have been suspended. I felt that the individual fine levied against him put too much blame squarely on him. It's never just one person. The organization as a whole should have taken that punishment. But, the organization did receive harsh punishments as well (most notably losing a first round draft pick). So, I might have gone about punishing the Pats differently. BUT, Goodell's punishment was harsh, and it was the largest punishment ever given out. What more does Spector want? We've seen everything that Matt Walsh has to offer, and to the best of my understanding there's no new evidence to indicate any new developments in this case.

Finally, let's take a minute to acknowledge the fact that the NFL is currently involved in a major dispute with Comcast, which just happens to be one of the largest overall contributors to the political campaigns of Arlen Spector. Those Eagles fans, you have to watch them.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I was only able to catch the fourth quarter of the Lakers game, so I won't comment extensively on it. But, the two main things that stood out were Pau Gasol's passing abilities, and the fact that neither Boozer nor Okur can cover Lamar Odom. Kobe looked fine to me (although, Phil Jackson said his jumper looked flat. I defer to Phil). I think Utah wins game 6.

21 comments:

MFerrante said...

Great post. I missed the Celts game last night, but your account did more for me than even the highlights did.

I am glad to hear a non Pats fan thinks Specter is ridiculous. I am dumfounded as to why no one in the media will come out and say this. Are they scared? People speak ill of the President all the time but they won't go against a senator (albeit a powerful one)? Also, I used to like Mark Schlereth, but he has been completely asinine on NFL Live lately in regards to "Spygate". Are there any people in the national media who have the sense to say the Pats cheated, they got caught, they got punished, and that is that. What more do they want? I blame this on the 24/7 sports machine we have right now and the fact that people like Skip Bayless have jobs. Everyone is trying to make a name for themselves by being as controversial and opinionated as possible.

I also heard that the reason why Specter was calling for an "independent" investigation was that the senator in charge of going forth with a congressional hearing was against it. At least someone in Congress isn't an absolute moron.

And one last thing: please keep in mind Sal Paolantonio hates the Pats. So his reporting is subtly biased.

MFerrante said...

Alright, maybe not so subtle:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=paolantonio_sal&id=3391620

Randomly found this, its long but I think its got some great points, including the rebuke of Goodell at the end:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/22844-New-England-Patriots-ESPN-s-Sal-Paolantonio---Time-to-Move-on-From-Spygate-130508

The real reason Goodell is treading so lightly, however, is the NFL's antitrust exemption that allows them to negotiate TV deals as a league and not a team by team basis. This has been given by the US legislature and presumably can be taken away by them as well. Note the date of this article (December '06, waaaay before any Spygate nonsense):

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2690171

Nick L. said...

And, the thing is, all football fans should be against this. Even if you hate the Patriots, ask yourself why do you hate them. Do you hate them because they're good and they score a lot of points and stomp their opponents? Probably. And, that's ok. That's part of sports.

But, you really don't hate them because of this. If you're one of those people who wants this to happen just because you hate the Patriots, then you're an idiot. This is going to be BAD FOR FOOTBALL. People have the Mitchell Investigation fresh in their minds, and they will treat this as if it is just as serious if the media tells them to. This is so different than the baseball situation. As soon as this came out, it was handled. There's nothing more that needs to be done.

So, those of you who want this investigation to happen just because you don't like the Pats need to relax. This is going to hurt the league if it happens. It's going to damage the league's reputation. It's going to bleed taxpayer money. AND, most of all, I can't shake the feeling that more than anything this is about the fact that Arlen Spector gets a lot of his campaign money from Comcast (which just so happens to be involved in a major dispute with the NFL right now).

MFerrante said...

Arlen Specter's 3rd largest campaign contributor since 1989 is Comcast, his first is Comcast's law firm, Blank Rome LLP. How does this slip by people?

http://opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&cid=N00001604

Do people realize Comcast is currently in a lawsuit with the NFL, accusing them of breach of contract? This is simply a case of Specter blackmailing the NFL to help out his biggest campaign contributor. It is shameful and transparent, and maybe Sal Paolantonio should spend more time investigating that than the Patriots.

http://consumerist.com/consumer/cable-war/comcast-sues-the-nfl-for-breach-of-contract-334206.php

MFerrante said...

I think that's what people forget most... this could hurt the sport just as much as it could hurt the Patriots. Football is doing as well as ever right now people want to cut off their nose to spite their face...

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nick L. said...

I know that they have that anit-trust exemption, and that's the same reason that baseball was investigated. But, this issue is not in any way big enough to warrant congressional money being spent. We had leads that hundreds of baseball players had been using sterroids for over 20 years.

Right now, we have proof that one team used a camera to videotape signals. They've been punished. Maybe we can all say "other teams do it too", but we have no proof of that. We have nothing to go on here. I just don't think we're far enough along.

I just think that the situations are so different, and Arlen's Spector's conflict of interest is JUST AS PRESENT AND OBVIOUS as Roger Goodell's.

Anonymous said...

Congress does a ton of stupid things (raise taxes, for one), but I actually think Specter is doing the right thing here.

Aside from Congress, who is going to force the NFL to investigate this matter completely and honestly? The media has no cards to play -- the NFL doesn't give a shit if they complain. But congress, because of the anti-trust issue, does have a card to play and they can get the NFL to come clean.

For example - as a fan, I still have a lot of questions: how exactly did this taping help the Patriots? who else was doing it? why didn't the league do something about it sooner?

And the league had not handled this investigation honestly or openly. Goodell destroyed the tapes after reviewing them and then handed out the punishment. Why couldn't someone else have a look at the tapes?

Anonymous said...

I guess my point is that Congress probably shouldn't be wasting everyone's time and money here, but as a fan, I see them as the last resort to get some answers.

It's bad for Pats fans, but the way the NFL handles this will go a long way towards either helping or destorying their credibility after this scandal...

Anonymous said...

Another thing that pisses me off is this: why did Bellichek say he "misinterpreted the rules" instead of just coming clean?

We know the NFL sent him a memo saying "video taping signals is a rule violation," but after that memo, he continued taping.

I wont bring up Walsh's specific comments, but he told ESPN that everyone on the Pats knew it was a rule violation.

So why didn't Bellichek just say he broke the rules and he was sorry? Why is he acting like it never happened?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nick L. said...

But, Goodell is already on record as saying that he doesn't believe Belichick. That's why the fine was so heavy. As of now, we have no proof that any other taping was going on. To the best of my knowledge, the NFL acted as soon as they had an actual situation (I think they issued that memo because they had heard rumors and complaints, but had no actual evidence before). And, I agree, they shouldn't have destroyed the tapes, but now we have all seen the Walsh tapes on tv.

Again, with baseball we are dealing with something that violates the law. There is no reason for Congress to pursue this.

Nick L. said...

And, Congress shouldn't need to force the NFL to investigate it, they're not breaking laws. The ball is in the NFL's court to maintain its own integrity. It's an insult to tax-paying people that don't give a shit about football if this happens.

Anonymous said...

Good work on the blog guys. Pike sent me this link the other week and I have been following your great work. I have a couple points on spygate:

1. In general, the taping of signals has been totally misunderstood. There is no way that that anyone on the planet could break down all of that film and learn anything from it over the course of halftime. We focused on division rivals because we play them twice a year and would have time to break down the film. The only way that the film would have even been useful is if we play a team for a second time AND they didn't change their signals. Given the paranoid nature of NFL teams, I highly doubt that they keep the same signals all year long. Even Jimmy Johnson admits that this has been a common practice for a very Long time. The other hilarious misconception is that we videotaped OFFENSIVE signnals!?!? I have even heard former NFL players talk about this. Hey guys, haven't you ever heard of the microphone in the quarterback's helmet? Has anyone ever had a coach signal in offensive plays? The only offensive signals are for personnell packages.

2. Ferrante points out Spector's obvious vendetta, but Sal Paolantonio is mad for a pretty interesting reason as well. I guess Sal hosts some sort of awards show in Philly every year. He was honoring a few of the Pats (Bellichick and Brady I think) and they no-showed him. Needless to say, he has hated them since.

3. If Spector is going to conduct a Mitchell-like investigation, he better look at ALL TEAMS and not just the Pats. I think this has been overlooked, but why wouldn't he investigate the entire NFL? Mitchell, after all, did exhaust all resources to investigate the entire MLB. If the Pats are individually targeted, this will be a great hypocracy.

4. How is the videotaping of other teams the most serious form of cheating? I really don't buy that this gave them a huge edge, especially since I would guarantee that other teams were doing it. How about the tampering with other teams to-be free agents that goes on so much? The 49ers just got busted for it after signing Lance Briggs about 30 seconds after the start of free agency. Would you rather have an unfair advantage in obtaining an impact PLAYER, or a bunch of video tapes that may or may not help. Players win the games, and the tampering issue (which is very widespread) is a far greater competative disadvantage. The Pats were a victim of tampering with Deoin Branch when he was feilding offers from a few teams while still under contract with the Pats. I hate the media's imbalanced portrayal of this whole thing.

MFerrante said...

I see your point, Ted, but is an investigation really going to settle the issue? Look at the Mitchell report, it exposed alot of people and possibly deterred others from using, but there are still a ton of questions out there. In addition, it turned everyone's focus on the negative side of baseball with really no upside. What did MLB want to accomplish? If they wanted a definitive end to the issue they certainly didn't get it, and I argue there are more questions now than before.

Turning back to the NFL, I think the pros and cons really need to be weighed here, and given the advantages gained are questionable (I believe more questionable than the advantage of HGH or steroids) I think the costs outweigh any possible gain. I don't think we will ever know what kind of advantage the Pats got from this, because it turns into a big game of he said she said (similar to the Mitchell report, because he had no power of subpoena). My personal opinion is at most they got a slight advantage but nothing to truly sway a game. Everyone will have differing opinions on this (and I am an admitted homer), but do we really think an investigation is going to yield concrete info? I think that is very unlikely.

I think what really bugs me about this whole thing is Arlen Specter should not be sticking his nose into this mess. As Nick said, both he and Goodell both have serious conflicts of interest here, but (as Nick said) no law was broken here. Do we see the Canadian Parliament investigating the size of goalie pads or too much curve on the hockey sticks? This is an internal NFL issue, not a legal issue, and thus members of Congress should stay out of it. Unless they want to keep getting campaign money from Comcast...

Nick L. said...

Casten, thanks for the comment. I couldn't agree more with what you're saying (and, you know I would be on the Spector bandwagon if I thought there was any validity to this).

Mark Schlereth has been one of the most outspoken pro-Spector people. This is the same Mark Schlereth that is an ex-Denver Bronco. The same Denver Broncos that lied about their salary cap numbers for two straight seasons. When asked about this, he said that it was like apples and oranges and that it didn't give Denver as big an advantage as the Pats taping. This is ridiculous, lying about your salary cap numbers if far worse and gives you a much bigger advantage.

What about when the Dolphins had tape with audio of the Patriots audibles a couple of years ago? How is that any different than having tapes of signals. An audible is a verbal signal.

These are the kinds of things were dealing with here. This is not the kind of stuff that Congress should be spending it's time on.

Nick L. said...

And, I can't stress it enough, the very fact that Spector has this conflict of interest because of his involvement with a corporation that is currently involved in a suit with the NFL means that his whole statement should be thrown out.

Like all Eagles fans, this is just an asshole who doesn't know anything about football.

Nick L. said...

Here's the last thing I'll say on this:

Ted, I don't want to discount your comments, because I think that a lot of people share your views. I don't really think that Belichick "misinterpreted the rules", but I think the punishment reflects the fact that the commisioner also doesn't believe him.

I wish the NFL had't destroyed the original tapes so fast, becuase it does make you wonder. I think if they had it to do over again, they would not have. But, we've seen the Walsh tapes and the NFL (not the Patriots, the NFL) has said that the stuff on the Walsh tapes is totally consistent with what was on the original tapes.

As Casten said, an investigation would have to include the whole league. I find it hard to believe that there is ANY evidence out there of this happening. Not because I don't think people do it, but because I think any evidence has been destroyed. Think about it, the original spygate happened in September. We've also had the Mitchell Report, which shows us what kind of paper trail investigators might look for. By now, any evidence has been terminated and all the loose ends are tied up.

I couldn't agree more with Ferrante, this seems like nothing more than Comcast using a powerful public figure to blackmail the league.


The Patriots have been punished. The league punished them harshly. There was a fake Herald report (which has since been discredited) that was a PR disaster for them nationwide. The long term impact of this whole thing are damaging for them. There is no need to go through this whole thing just for the sake of punishing them more.

Finally, I would just like to state that Ted Gilbert is exempt from any blanket statements I may have made about Eagles fans today.

Anonymous said...

18 comments...excellent

At the end of the day, you guys are probably right. This isn't a scandal like steroids in baseball and it certainly doesn't give teams a huge advantage, like steroids do.

And for the most part, I think you're right about the media causing more than harm than good, Mike. All they seem to do is sensationalize things and blow them way out of proportion. And people will definately make this a bigger issue if the media keeps following it.

That said, I guess the NFL and the media should just move on.

I just wish the Pats weren't such assholes about it.

MFerrante said...

Enjoyed the back and forth today as well as the opposing point of view from you, Ted. I like hearing what intelligent non Pats fans have to say. Thanks for reading my longwinded rhetoric. I was watching NFL Live last night at 12:30 and it got me all fired up.

Anonymous said...

Thanks, Ferrante. We're glad you're here reading our BS, too